None of this is to say that the idea of a relational duty of care is incoherent or an illusion. The law of negligence does announce a legal duty to take care against foreseeably injuring others, a duty that is most often formulated as owed to those whom one might foreseeably injure, and the expressive effect of this announcement is to recognize such a moral duty as well. It is no illusion to suppose that there can exist such a relational moral duty, or that it may play various roles in ordinary moral thought.330 Rather, the normative illusion persistently engendered by the place of the relational legal duty of care in the formal structure of the negligence tort is that the breach of any such relational duty is the ground of liability to compensate for negligently inflicted injury (by the lights of either ordinary moral thought or the law of negligence). This illusion is dispelled only by comparative legal reflection, and by closely attending to cases in which relational wrongdoing (breach of relational duty) extensionally diverges from the overlapping but distinct moral phenomenon of fault-based responsibility for rights infringement.
Последние новости
，推荐阅读有道翻译官网获取更多信息
由日本漫画家小川悦司创作的经典料理漫画《中华小当家!极》(《中華一番!極》)即将迎来惊人转折。根据官方最新预告，作品将从即将更新的第197话正式开启前所未有的“冥界篇”。，更多细节参见okx
nsis: add Chinese translation to nsis installer